The World According to George # 1
Pandemics, Supply Chain disruption, and fear are great ways to socially engineer society.
Support the show:
https://www.paypal.me/Truelifepodcast?locale.x=en_US
Buy Grow kit:
https://modernmushroomcultivation.com/
This Band willl Blow your Mind!
Codex Serafini:
https://codexserafini.bandcamp.com/album/the-imprecation-of-anima
https://www.paypal.me/Truelifepodcast?locale.x=en_US
Buy Grow kit:
https://modernmushroomcultivation.com/
This Band willl Blow your Mind!
Codex Serafini:
https://codexserafini.bandcamp.com/album/the-imprecation-of-anima
Listen to the gentleman at time stamp 20:30
https://youtu.be/rV2FCreE_p0
Transcript:
Speaker 0 (0s): Welcome back. My friends. How in the heck are you guys doing well? I'm sorry. Are you ladies and gentlemen doing well? I just thought I would check in and a kind of go over some rough terrain. No one has conspiracies. They're fun. Right? It's fun to think about. And it's interesting to think about, especially now when the world seems to make no sense of what the heck is going on in this world.
Right? Isn't it crazy? It's so crazy to me from COVID-19 to meet shortages to gas, shortages, to inflation. Let me ask you this. Do you think that all these shortages, that the inflation, that the instability, do you think those are symptoms of COVID-19 or do you think maybe it's part of the plan of COVID 19?
What do you guys think? It's so interesting to me to try and decipher what a could possibly be. And that's what I want to cover. There's a lot of information coming out right now about the lab leak theory is everybody familiar with what that is? The lab leak theory states that the COVID 19, that the Wu Han novel Corona virus was made in a lab.
And with that <inaudible>, There was a very funny skit by John Stuart and Stephen Colbert, where John Stewart went on stage on a mainstream American news channel and made that claim. He says, isn't it odd that the Wu Han novel Corona virus was found by a lab named the Wu Han Corona, no novel Corona virus lab.
And when you, when you just peel back the onion a little bit, it's like, how can it not be that like how much spin does it have to be for us to not look at the facts? Another interesting point that I noticed was that if you want to know what's going on, it's not enough to read the papers in our country. It's not enough to read a right leaning paper and a left leaning paper because ultimately those people are the same.
You know what I mean? By that? Like people, oh, all, all Republican or Democrat, these are two different parties wrong. It's one big party. It's like a magic trick. You know, when you think of David Copperfield or Houdini or David Blaine magic is baby based on misdirection. Look here, not here. Look here, not here.
Right? It's slight of hand. And it is a illusion. It is a distraction. And that, to me, my friends, just what the Corona viruses, that is what COVID-19 is a link to some, I will link to this interview. I saw it was a gentleman from India. Apparently India is getting hit really hard right now, you know, and they are working diligently to find out more about this virus.
And they had some really interesting panel's on there. And they had a, a, a gentleman that came on, it was like a, five-person a round table. And four out of the five agreed that it was made in China with funding from the U S but it gets better not just funding from the us, but directly from Dr.
Fowchee and a gentleman named Peter dat, Dan Zack, Peter Danza. Here's how they broke it down. There's a military base on the east coast called Fort Dietrich that was working on gain of function research. For those of you that don't know what a gain of function is. A gain of function is creating man-made disease is that could possibly possibly happened in the future deadly diseases.
And you might think yourself, why would anybody make a deadly man-made disease that we don't currently have? Well, the argument is that just in case nature made it, we would be able to have a vaccine. That's one idea. Another idea is that this is a biological warfare and that we are desperately trying to create new man-made diseases. So we can kill people that we don't like. And the truth is it's probably both those things. So that's what they were working on at Fort Dietrich.
And who was in charge of the funding at Fort Dietrich was Dr. Fowchee. The idea of gain of function was frowned upon and ultimately disbanded by Congress and our government. They said, this is a bad idea. Let's not do it. However, because they had a little bit of time and funds. That's a very important because they had money left over.
That was appropriated to this research. They farmed it out to the Wu Han lab and China. So they shut down in Fort Dietrich, but they still have a funding. They took all that money and they sent the money over to research in China to do this gain of function. And that is where the Corona virus came from. It's a mix of American funding in a Chinese lab.
This is basically what the Indian researchers have found. So they know, in my opinion, the research they have is a no brainer. That's exactly what happened. That's exactly what happened now, in my opinion, which is even more interesting is the medical research they've done. Now. There's such intelligent DRS and incredibly intelligent people throughout the world.
And I found like this Indian news channel, just to be riveting, they went in to talk about how this particular disease was made. And I want to share that with you guys. So the spike protein let's think of a ball, a tennis ball with what they think of a sea urchin. And you guys ever seen a sea urchin. It's like a little ball with all these huge spikes coming out. And that's exactly what a spike protein looks like. So the spike protein gets injected.
I'm sorry. The spike protein goes in to, well, let, let us talk a little bit about how viruses occur naturally before we get into the injections. So the virus usually is contracted into the nasal passage or the mouth, and then that's the upper respiratory system. The spike protein usually stays in that area and can be defeated by the immune system when it gets into the lungs.
If it goes down deeper into your throat, that's when you start getting people who have pneumonia. That's when you started getting these, these other respiratory issues. So people with asthma, people with bronchitis, there are a lot more at risk than people who don't have those because people who tend to get those two things tend to have an immune system that's somewhat compromised, making it easier for the COVID-19 to get into the lungs. The Indian doctors went on to say that D biological makeup of our, in fact, like a block chain, you can see where they have been spliced.
You can see what part of a virus is here and what part of a virus is there in according to these virologists, there is no doubt. There can be no doubt. This is a man made a virus. And I know that some people are thinking, oh, George, what about the paper in the Lancet? What about the seven doctors that came out in the beginning? So there's no way this is a manmade disease. Well, the problem with that is, again, our friend Peter Danzig, this gentlemen is responsible for funding hand lab.
He's a virologist. And he also wrote a paper that said that couldn't be man-made. So at the very least, the paper in the Lancet is a conflict of interests. The very least at the most, it's an attempt to cover up a biological weapon that was released on the public. That's a possibility. It's a real possibility. It's a real possibility.
There is a Luke Monte, Monte Negro. I know I'm butcher in that name, but I believe it's something like that. Luke Montenegro, he is a Nobel Laureate in the field of sirens in the field of science, specifically in viruses. He is a no bell Laureate. When it in virology, this gentlemen has been making the rounds.
He agrees that this virus is man-made and he agrees that the vaccines actually, he doesn't call them vaccines. He calls them gene therapy because the MRN a vaccines be at the Moderna and the Pfizer, as well as the Johnson and Johnson. These are all gene based therapies. They're not vaccines. They have been a emergent. They have been given emergency approval by the FDA, which is different than approval by the FDA.
You see what the emergency approval, there can be no liability. There can be no <inaudible>
Speaker 1 (11m 27s): Done by the pharmaceutical companies,
Speaker 0 (11m 31s): But what's really, really scary about the vaccines. According to this Nobel Laureate, is that what these vaccines, these gene therapies are going to do is they're going to cause your immune system to be hyper vigilant specifically with Corona virus variance. Does that make sense? Gene therapy is training your body to attack these specific Corona virus like variance.
Well, your immune system would work by. So you're normally would like we talked to, you would get the virus through your nasal passage or through your mouth, and it would come from the outside into your body. And that is how the immune system is used to attacking viruses. When you get it from the outside, into your nose, into your body, then the immune system knows how to attack it. What the gene therapy is doing is injecting the spike proteins into your body.
You see that's the opposite way it normally comes. The virus usually comes from the outside in it doesn't come from the inside out. And because of the size of the spike protein, this gentleman is saying that it's a large spike protein. And because I guess it's coming from the inside because they're injecting it into your body. It's causing incredibly disruptive problems with the immune system.
This man-made spike protein is attaching itself to cell walls. It's attaching itself to
Speaker 1 (13m 24s): A
Speaker 0 (13m 25s): Parts of the brain. You know, viruses don't normally get into the brain. He says that what you're seeing with what, with people who get the vaccines is a lot of blood clotting. Some of them we're in the brain, some were in the heart and that we haven't seen anything yet. He said that within two years, the law term ramifications of people who got the vaccine or the gene therapy, we're going to be in a world of trouble, a world of trouble because their body has been trained to a hundred attack, this type of Corona virus.
So when next fall and next flu season, if there's another, it doesn't even have to be the Wu Han virus. If there's a Corona virus, there's a good chance that these experimental gene therapies is going to cause your body to violently attack itself. When it's introduced into a new Corona virus and the ramifications are going to be the same. So bell Laureate says that the number is that they are trotting out about people being saved by this virus is complete bullshit.
Like you don't see that guy on TV. You have to look for him. An interesting question to ask yourself is, do you think that this just escaped the lab? Or do you think that this was released from the lab? There's plenty of evidence for both plenty of evidence for both? No. I think it's interesting to tie everything together.
Like if we think about, if we just think about where we were before the Corona virus, there was a yellow vest uprisings in France, there was Syriza in Greece. There was a Donald Trump independent movement in the U S that was the Brexit movement in the UK. There was the riots in Hong Kong, the Mideast, the middle Eastern spring.
There were people around the world rioting for the end of globalization, there was a middle-class rising up and saying no more. We can't do this. We're getting slaughtered out here. All the money's being kicked up to the global corporations. And there's nothing left for the people in the bottom. That's a fact. Now, if we go back in time a little bit, you know, the, the fourth turning or the, the rise of another generation, Marie Antoinette, let them eat cake moments.
It's always the middle-class rising up and slaughtering, violently murdering the political class and the, the top 1%, it's their greed in their selfishness that lead to the violent behavior of the people underneath him. And that was what was all of these riots were about. These riots were about the unfair treatment of the labor class, the unfair treatment of the people below the labor
Speaker 1 (17m 16s): Class.
Speaker 0 (17m 18s): So if you are the top 1%, if you are the queen of England, if you are the Zuckerberg, if you are the world economic forum, if you are the Davos crowd, what do you do? Well, the only way to continue to rule the world, you see fit is to slaughter your enemies, right? If you look at it, like they're all going to kill us, that we're going to kill them. What are you going to do? You have all the money, you have all the resources. You're gonna try to kill everybody.
That's what I think is going on. I think that you're seeing, I think that you're seeing a delusional set of world leaders fearing for their way of life and their family's way of life, capturing all the resources and trying to create a class of serfs forever while maintaining their status while maintaining their stranglehold and the resources of the war, a world.
That's one way of looking at it. Another way to look at it is that, you know, maybe there's some really, really fucking smart, goddamn people, right? And all that. A lot of people at the top have worked their fucking ass off to get there. And they probably think the world's not fair. Everybody knows the world's not fair. What could we, could we, as people that have so much try and make the world better for people below us, I think there's a lot of people at the top of that, believe that, or how would you do it?
How would you do it? Will, you would look at those state of the world and say, wow, our politicians are so corrupt. They take bribes from lobbyists and they don't. They care about the wellbeing of their people. They care about power. So if we could just get rid of the politician's and have the world run by engineers, then we could, you know, there's more than enough power. There's more than enough food. There's more than enough resources to go around. If we could just distribute them somebody, right.
If we could fundamentally change the design of the supply chains, and we could get stuff to people who need it, most, the world would be a better fit a place. So I think there's an argument made for, for that. You know, I think that if we go back to the, like that green movement, or if we just go back to some of what was happening prior to COVID-19, we can see the difference facts that, you know, there was a push against factory farming.
There's a push against oil. You know, there was a push against all these things that were quote unquote environmental issues. But here's how you've got to ask yourself, why are those environmental issues? You know, why do we care about meat? Why do we care about gas? What do we care about that? Well, the answer is here in the west. A you can get a hamburger anywhere, right? A cost you that it costs you like a dollar or maybe two bucks now with inflation.
But I know that a hamburger would probably cost 20 bucks, but it's subsidized. And there's a bunch of disgusting farming everywhere. That's kind of ruining the land. And no it's a degradation of the environment because of factory farming is a huge problem, especially, and here's the kicker. The rest of the world wants to be like the rich Western countries. They want to be able to go get a hamburger. Some are, they wanna be able to drive the car.
They want all the same things that the people in the rich Western countries have right there. They want to be industrialized. They want to have these things. They want to have all these benefits for their kids and their families and live the Western lifestyle. But if the whole world did that, then the level of degradation on the planet, it would be unlivable. So you can't, you can't just, Can you, you can't just go into another country and say, look, man, you can't live like us. You guys have to be slaves forever.
Even though that's what we've been doing, we've been doing. I think it's the, like a <inaudible> in law that says that there must always be an underclass that will do that shitty jobs. And no one wants like that. That's kind of a foundation of capitalism is that there must be a class of slaves to do the shitty work. No one wants to
Speaker 1 (22m 6s): That is beneath people.
Speaker 0 (22m 8s): I'm not judging. I mean, I'm not saying I believe that what I'm saying that if you take any real economic class or you read any books on economics, then that's pretty much a written rule. And those who tell you, that's not a ruler. So if you want the rest of the world
Speaker 1 (22m 32s): To
Speaker 0 (22m 34s): Live a better life, that means that people that live in the west have to lead the way. That means we got to do a way with factory form. And that means we've got to do a way with the cards. That means we gotta live a more humble lifestyle. Oh. And here in lies, the problem it's easy. It's easier to not attain something and have something taken away from you. Right? There was a S there was a, a book I read called a called.
That was by it's called never split the difference. And it was by the world's leading hostage negotiator. And he spoke a bit about a class at Harvard that he took it and he goes, they did this experiment at Harvard, where they gave a class comes in and they gave half the class, a ceramic mug. And the other the half got no ceramic mug. And they wanted people to team up one person with a mug and one person without a mug. And they said, okay, we want you guys to negotiate.
You know, whoever doesn't have the mug, she tried to negotiate to try to buy the mug and let's see what happens. So they did plenty of negotiations and what they found out when they broke everything down. Some people sold some but more people didn't sell. Even when offered, you know, a, a a hundred bucks, the people were like, nah, I like my mug. And the teachers wanted to know why they go look, we gave you that mug for free. Why, why wouldn't you take the free a hundred bucks? And the people said, oh, well, this is my mug now.
And I don't want to sell it. So they began to find out that once people have something, economics is irrational, no matter how much money you give someone, they want to keep the thing that belongs to them because they believe it's part of them and they don't want to give it up. So let's factor that into the rich Western lifestyle. People have people in the west have two cars, they have a house, they have a yard, they have a pet.
You know, their kid goes to school to take a couple of vacations. They eat meat every day, they drive their fossil fuel car. How do you take that away from them without them fighting? How do you take that stuff away and decrease their level of life style? Well, you have to run a campaign of incredible propaganda. You have to scare them. You have to do a lot of nefarious things in order to break down their psyche.
And the most fucked up part is that the people that are running this campaign, that one, a take away the shit from the middle-class. People are not willing to give up anything in theirs. You see that they have these grand allusions in these grand ideas. In order for us to make the world a better place, we have to take a giant shit on the people right below us. Even that if our countrymen, even if there are a family, we've got a steal their shit. So we can make the world a better place for everyone. What they don't understand is that if they want to make the world a better place, they should lead by fucking example, but they're not willing to give up their matches.
They're not willing to give up their lifestyle. They want you to give up your lifestyle. Think about people like the Royal family or Leonard, Leonard, a DiCaprio. They fly around their goddamn Jet's and tell you your a piece of shit for fucking driving. An old car. Look at Al gore. This dummy has how many that, what is his carbon footprint? Like if you just think for a minute about the people who are running the carbon footprint game, think about the people that are lying to you and using the environment as a shield.
Like I love the planet and everybody, I know that loves the planet, but I hate with a passion. People who try to hide behind environmental regulations to steal from other people. That's a huge problem. That's a huge problem. And most of them say things like, oh, well, we're just doing it to make the world better. No, you're doing it to make yourself better. You lie to yourself about the problem with the planet, and then you steal from everybody else.
I think that's kind of where we are. Okay. Now let me try to tie everything together a little bit. So look at these recent hacks, right? What happened? There was a hacker in a pipeline gas shortage. There was a hack on the meat, plants, meat shortage. Like, isn't it interesting that other so-called Russians or other in government people are hacking the very things that the climate warming alarmists want them to hack.
Isn't that weird? Isn't it weird that COVID-19 is causing small businesses to shut down, but allowing a large multinational corporations to stay afloat like that to me is not a coincidence. In fact, I believe that a coincidence. It's what you get when you don't have all the facts. A coincidence is what you get. When you apply a bad theory, you're going to see more hacks.
And you're going to see more hacks on the industries that the global corporations want. Shut down. You see, they're going to try and modify and utilize BF Skinner type techniques to change your behavior for everyone. It's the hard sell. Oh, and what better way to do it than with an invisible boogeyman, depending on where you are born.
There's always an invisible boogeyman. There's the communist. Oh, no. The big, bad calm. You know, there is the terrorist. Oh no. The comm in his hand, a terrorist. Hey, if you don't, if you don't do this terrorist win, Hey man, if they don't stop eating meat, you're gonna kill a planet. Hey man, you didn't take your shoes off a terrorist when, Hey man, we can have that communism. When you said these are all invisible boogie men that have been perpetrated in order to change the behavior of the public through fear.
And I'm of the opinion I'm of the opinion that you don't, that there will be T like the people getting injected right now with COVID-19 because make no mistake. Like these are the people that have a most effected. And let me just, I don't it's in my opinion, I don't know. But like, let's say, lets say that these particular gene therapies do cause a violent, a violent sort of a response to the next Corona virus.
You see people aren't going to understand that they are, they're not gonna think to themselves. Oh, I got the Corona virus, injection, AKA gene therapy. And now in a new way, when the flu season hits, I'm going to be even worse because my body is going to not attack it in the right way. It's going to hyper attack it and attack my body. While that attacks the virus, the same people that got this gene therapy are going to get hit hard next year and the following year. And it's going to look, it's going to look like it's another wave of viruses.
It's going to look like it's another wave. But in reality, it's because of the gene therapy, you see that they are socially engineering or the next wave of viruses by forcing people to take this experimental gene therapy. It's going to cause those people to be in a worse position next year. Why would they do that, George?
Well, which one among you? Who among you? What do you want among you thinks that the pharmaceutical companies give one fuck about you. All you have to do is like, you know, how about the immortal life of Henrietta lacks? You know, how about the Tuskegee airmen? Our world is filled with mangled as children. You know, science has zero morals.
Science wants to try and explain everything and has no brakes your country, regardless of where you live is filled with human experimentation.
Speaker 1 (31m 51s): It's filled with it. It's everywhere.
Speaker 0 (31m 55s): Think about this. Look at the demographics of the majority of Western countries in America, a miss paraphrasing here. But I think within the next 20 years, over 50%, it might be 60% of the individuals are going to be over 60 years old. We have no cure for Alzheimer's. We have no cure for, for dementia. We don't have any cure for these diseases that are going to plague our world. And how can you have a vibrant economy when the majority of people in your country are geriatric?
How do you take care of them? Not only that, what happens when all of those people that are geriatrics have all the money and they're not spending their money in the economy. Like if you just about it, logically the populations of the west are aging, getting old. They have all the money and it's gonna fucking tank our economy. And it's going to make the world a very uncomfortable place for people that are under the age of 30 or 35, it's going to make, 'em almost destitute.
So what do you do? Well, we need, some people say that we need to aggressively aggressively be looking for signs to help people with dementia. We need to be aggressively doing experiments to find out how to cure Alzheimer's do you guys know part of the gene therapy does for this, for these a M R and D vaccines inside the MRN, a vaccine is instructions to fold proteins, I guess folded proteins are also called prions Brian's or what gets people mad cow disease Alzheimer's disease as a form of plaque in the brain that could be proteins that were folded wrong.
Speaker 1 (33m 50s): So
Speaker 0 (33m 51s): I think plausible to say that this large scale human experimentation on people is an attempt to have an unethical hundreds of millions of people, clinical trials, to try and find cures for new diseases, because we desperately need them. I'm not a judge or a jury, but you're going to do clinical trials on hundreds of millions of people's and ethnicities so that you might find out how to cure a disease.
And then you're going to lie to all the people about them. Like what, why would we do that? Why would we do it? No, for a long time. That blew my mind. Like, if you look at the, if you think about the generational gap, like baby boomers like that, my mom, my dad, they were so fearful of this virus. Oh no, Jesus. He's going to kill everybody. Oh, all gonna die in a 600,000 people in America are dead.
You know, there's bodies laying on the ground. Like, you know, even like that, my neighbor, I love, I love my family and my neighbors, but they, they, the ones that are Boomer's, they just have this crazy idea of like, you have to get the vaccine, man, you have to get it. I was having a conversation with my neighbor whom I love. And he's like, look, man, you got to get the vaccine. I'm like, why? He's like, what do you mean why? He's like, if you get the vaccine, you have a 0% chance of going to the hospital.
I was like talking to myself that I started laughing. You know, I didn't mean to be rude, but I was like what? He goes, yeah. If you get the vaccine, you have a 0% chance of going to the hospital and be in on a ventilator. I just told him, I'm like, are you kidding me? You have a 0% chance of that. I'm like, I don't, I disagree. You're not. And that's not what I read. You know, I've, in my opinion, like the vaccine, AKA, the gene therapy, it doesn't stop transmission.
It doesn't stop you from getting it. All that does is potentially potentially make the symptoms a little bit easier and that's not even proven. So I asked him, I'm like, what? Where did you, what did you get your information? You know what all of them do, all of the boomers watch TV. Like that is where the boomers go to get their information. And I don't care if they watch Fox or if they watch CNN, we've already covered it. That's the same. It's just opposite sides of the same coin.
Both of those dummies, those channels are pumping this vaccine, propaganda, this gene therapy propaganda. Right? And if that, everybody needs to know if you're in marketing, you understand the term target demographics, right? That if you target, if you aren't Facebook, if you market anywhere, you are asked, what is your target demographics? And I can tell you that when it comes to TV, the target demographics for TV are older people, right?
There's a saying that says, if you're over the age of 50, you live in 1970. If you're over the age, if you're under the age of 30, you live in 2010. So the people that are older, the age of 50, they are set in their ways. They get their information from TV. Their brains are not being used. Would you continue to be plastic that the plasticity of their brains is not being utilized?
Does that make sense? They're not making new connections. They're happy with the convictions. They have, they're getting their information. And so the government uses that channel of older people, target demographics to hit them with this vaccine. Why? Well, those are the people that are going to be at risk and the next 20 to 30 years. So if the virus comes and all our, our idea that these gene therapy is going to cause those people at a dilator, well, it's no big deal because they economy is gonna be better off because of it.
It's going to free up money to go into the economy is going to potentially be recorded so that people can find cures for Alzheimer's. You know what? That it's a giant clinical study on people over the age of 50, because that is going to be a population that's going to drain society. So somewhere along the lines, the decision was made, okay, these people are no longer producing. They are just sitting on money. We don't have social security.
They have all the money. These people are dead weight. Let's fucking experiment on them and get them the fuck out of here that also the easiest people to scare, right? They're getting their information from a, a, a resource that is controlled by the government. These are some of the reasons I was just having my mind blown about this. COVID mess you.
I haven't really got too much into the inflation aspect of, and maybe I'll say that part for tomorrow or later in the week, but all these things are running together. I think it's in, in summary. Let me say that. I think what we're seeing is a, a radical effort to step on the working class and lower class of people so that the richest wealthiest people can maintain their lifestyle.
I think we're seeing a radical, a radical change in the economy. We are seeing
Speaker 1 (40m 7s): An attempt to
Speaker 0 (40m 10s): Fundamentally shift supply chains, a technocratic take-over and attempt for engineers to run the world instead of politicians, which I'm not against. But it just seems silly to me that the engineers don't understand that if they get rid of the politicians and they are going to become the politician. But I think we're going to continue to see a large-scale devastation. We are going to see a continued hacks on infrastructure, on supply chains and that the time to prepare is now, anyways, that's all I got for you guys today.
I love you. I hope your day is going awesome. And I appreciate your taking a moment to spend with me. Let me know what you guys think. Put down in your comments, put down a, a, a, either ideas and a get at me. I love you guys a little hot.
https://youtu.be/rV2FCreE_p0
Transcript:
Speaker 0 (0s): Welcome back. My friends. How in the heck are you guys doing well? I'm sorry. Are you ladies and gentlemen doing well? I just thought I would check in and a kind of go over some rough terrain. No one has conspiracies. They're fun. Right? It's fun to think about. And it's interesting to think about, especially now when the world seems to make no sense of what the heck is going on in this world.
Right? Isn't it crazy? It's so crazy to me from COVID-19 to meet shortages to gas, shortages, to inflation. Let me ask you this. Do you think that all these shortages, that the inflation, that the instability, do you think those are symptoms of COVID-19 or do you think maybe it's part of the plan of COVID 19?
What do you guys think? It's so interesting to me to try and decipher what a could possibly be. And that's what I want to cover. There's a lot of information coming out right now about the lab leak theory is everybody familiar with what that is? The lab leak theory states that the COVID 19, that the Wu Han novel Corona virus was made in a lab.
And with that <inaudible>, There was a very funny skit by John Stuart and Stephen Colbert, where John Stewart went on stage on a mainstream American news channel and made that claim. He says, isn't it odd that the Wu Han novel Corona virus was found by a lab named the Wu Han Corona, no novel Corona virus lab.
And when you, when you just peel back the onion a little bit, it's like, how can it not be that like how much spin does it have to be for us to not look at the facts? Another interesting point that I noticed was that if you want to know what's going on, it's not enough to read the papers in our country. It's not enough to read a right leaning paper and a left leaning paper because ultimately those people are the same.
You know what I mean? By that? Like people, oh, all, all Republican or Democrat, these are two different parties wrong. It's one big party. It's like a magic trick. You know, when you think of David Copperfield or Houdini or David Blaine magic is baby based on misdirection. Look here, not here. Look here, not here.
Right? It's slight of hand. And it is a illusion. It is a distraction. And that, to me, my friends, just what the Corona viruses, that is what COVID-19 is a link to some, I will link to this interview. I saw it was a gentleman from India. Apparently India is getting hit really hard right now, you know, and they are working diligently to find out more about this virus.
And they had some really interesting panel's on there. And they had a, a, a gentleman that came on, it was like a, five-person a round table. And four out of the five agreed that it was made in China with funding from the U S but it gets better not just funding from the us, but directly from Dr.
Fowchee and a gentleman named Peter dat, Dan Zack, Peter Danza. Here's how they broke it down. There's a military base on the east coast called Fort Dietrich that was working on gain of function research. For those of you that don't know what a gain of function is. A gain of function is creating man-made disease is that could possibly possibly happened in the future deadly diseases.
And you might think yourself, why would anybody make a deadly man-made disease that we don't currently have? Well, the argument is that just in case nature made it, we would be able to have a vaccine. That's one idea. Another idea is that this is a biological warfare and that we are desperately trying to create new man-made diseases. So we can kill people that we don't like. And the truth is it's probably both those things. So that's what they were working on at Fort Dietrich.
And who was in charge of the funding at Fort Dietrich was Dr. Fowchee. The idea of gain of function was frowned upon and ultimately disbanded by Congress and our government. They said, this is a bad idea. Let's not do it. However, because they had a little bit of time and funds. That's a very important because they had money left over.
That was appropriated to this research. They farmed it out to the Wu Han lab and China. So they shut down in Fort Dietrich, but they still have a funding. They took all that money and they sent the money over to research in China to do this gain of function. And that is where the Corona virus came from. It's a mix of American funding in a Chinese lab.
This is basically what the Indian researchers have found. So they know, in my opinion, the research they have is a no brainer. That's exactly what happened. That's exactly what happened now, in my opinion, which is even more interesting is the medical research they've done. Now. There's such intelligent DRS and incredibly intelligent people throughout the world.
And I found like this Indian news channel, just to be riveting, they went in to talk about how this particular disease was made. And I want to share that with you guys. So the spike protein let's think of a ball, a tennis ball with what they think of a sea urchin. And you guys ever seen a sea urchin. It's like a little ball with all these huge spikes coming out. And that's exactly what a spike protein looks like. So the spike protein gets injected.
I'm sorry. The spike protein goes in to, well, let, let us talk a little bit about how viruses occur naturally before we get into the injections. So the virus usually is contracted into the nasal passage or the mouth, and then that's the upper respiratory system. The spike protein usually stays in that area and can be defeated by the immune system when it gets into the lungs.
If it goes down deeper into your throat, that's when you start getting people who have pneumonia. That's when you started getting these, these other respiratory issues. So people with asthma, people with bronchitis, there are a lot more at risk than people who don't have those because people who tend to get those two things tend to have an immune system that's somewhat compromised, making it easier for the COVID-19 to get into the lungs. The Indian doctors went on to say that D biological makeup of our, in fact, like a block chain, you can see where they have been spliced.
You can see what part of a virus is here and what part of a virus is there in according to these virologists, there is no doubt. There can be no doubt. This is a man made a virus. And I know that some people are thinking, oh, George, what about the paper in the Lancet? What about the seven doctors that came out in the beginning? So there's no way this is a manmade disease. Well, the problem with that is, again, our friend Peter Danzig, this gentlemen is responsible for funding hand lab.
He's a virologist. And he also wrote a paper that said that couldn't be man-made. So at the very least, the paper in the Lancet is a conflict of interests. The very least at the most, it's an attempt to cover up a biological weapon that was released on the public. That's a possibility. It's a real possibility. It's a real possibility.
There is a Luke Monte, Monte Negro. I know I'm butcher in that name, but I believe it's something like that. Luke Montenegro, he is a Nobel Laureate in the field of sirens in the field of science, specifically in viruses. He is a no bell Laureate. When it in virology, this gentlemen has been making the rounds.
He agrees that this virus is man-made and he agrees that the vaccines actually, he doesn't call them vaccines. He calls them gene therapy because the MRN a vaccines be at the Moderna and the Pfizer, as well as the Johnson and Johnson. These are all gene based therapies. They're not vaccines. They have been a emergent. They have been given emergency approval by the FDA, which is different than approval by the FDA.
You see what the emergency approval, there can be no liability. There can be no <inaudible>
Speaker 1 (11m 27s): Done by the pharmaceutical companies,
Speaker 0 (11m 31s): But what's really, really scary about the vaccines. According to this Nobel Laureate, is that what these vaccines, these gene therapies are going to do is they're going to cause your immune system to be hyper vigilant specifically with Corona virus variance. Does that make sense? Gene therapy is training your body to attack these specific Corona virus like variance.
Well, your immune system would work by. So you're normally would like we talked to, you would get the virus through your nasal passage or through your mouth, and it would come from the outside into your body. And that is how the immune system is used to attacking viruses. When you get it from the outside, into your nose, into your body, then the immune system knows how to attack it. What the gene therapy is doing is injecting the spike proteins into your body.
You see that's the opposite way it normally comes. The virus usually comes from the outside in it doesn't come from the inside out. And because of the size of the spike protein, this gentleman is saying that it's a large spike protein. And because I guess it's coming from the inside because they're injecting it into your body. It's causing incredibly disruptive problems with the immune system.
This man-made spike protein is attaching itself to cell walls. It's attaching itself to
Speaker 1 (13m 24s): A
Speaker 0 (13m 25s): Parts of the brain. You know, viruses don't normally get into the brain. He says that what you're seeing with what, with people who get the vaccines is a lot of blood clotting. Some of them we're in the brain, some were in the heart and that we haven't seen anything yet. He said that within two years, the law term ramifications of people who got the vaccine or the gene therapy, we're going to be in a world of trouble, a world of trouble because their body has been trained to a hundred attack, this type of Corona virus.
So when next fall and next flu season, if there's another, it doesn't even have to be the Wu Han virus. If there's a Corona virus, there's a good chance that these experimental gene therapies is going to cause your body to violently attack itself. When it's introduced into a new Corona virus and the ramifications are going to be the same. So bell Laureate says that the number is that they are trotting out about people being saved by this virus is complete bullshit.
Like you don't see that guy on TV. You have to look for him. An interesting question to ask yourself is, do you think that this just escaped the lab? Or do you think that this was released from the lab? There's plenty of evidence for both plenty of evidence for both? No. I think it's interesting to tie everything together.
Like if we think about, if we just think about where we were before the Corona virus, there was a yellow vest uprisings in France, there was Syriza in Greece. There was a Donald Trump independent movement in the U S that was the Brexit movement in the UK. There was the riots in Hong Kong, the Mideast, the middle Eastern spring.
There were people around the world rioting for the end of globalization, there was a middle-class rising up and saying no more. We can't do this. We're getting slaughtered out here. All the money's being kicked up to the global corporations. And there's nothing left for the people in the bottom. That's a fact. Now, if we go back in time a little bit, you know, the, the fourth turning or the, the rise of another generation, Marie Antoinette, let them eat cake moments.
It's always the middle-class rising up and slaughtering, violently murdering the political class and the, the top 1%, it's their greed in their selfishness that lead to the violent behavior of the people underneath him. And that was what was all of these riots were about. These riots were about the unfair treatment of the labor class, the unfair treatment of the people below the labor
Speaker 1 (17m 16s): Class.
Speaker 0 (17m 18s): So if you are the top 1%, if you are the queen of England, if you are the Zuckerberg, if you are the world economic forum, if you are the Davos crowd, what do you do? Well, the only way to continue to rule the world, you see fit is to slaughter your enemies, right? If you look at it, like they're all going to kill us, that we're going to kill them. What are you going to do? You have all the money, you have all the resources. You're gonna try to kill everybody.
That's what I think is going on. I think that you're seeing, I think that you're seeing a delusional set of world leaders fearing for their way of life and their family's way of life, capturing all the resources and trying to create a class of serfs forever while maintaining their status while maintaining their stranglehold and the resources of the war, a world.
That's one way of looking at it. Another way to look at it is that, you know, maybe there's some really, really fucking smart, goddamn people, right? And all that. A lot of people at the top have worked their fucking ass off to get there. And they probably think the world's not fair. Everybody knows the world's not fair. What could we, could we, as people that have so much try and make the world better for people below us, I think there's a lot of people at the top of that, believe that, or how would you do it?
How would you do it? Will, you would look at those state of the world and say, wow, our politicians are so corrupt. They take bribes from lobbyists and they don't. They care about the wellbeing of their people. They care about power. So if we could just get rid of the politician's and have the world run by engineers, then we could, you know, there's more than enough power. There's more than enough food. There's more than enough resources to go around. If we could just distribute them somebody, right.
If we could fundamentally change the design of the supply chains, and we could get stuff to people who need it, most, the world would be a better fit a place. So I think there's an argument made for, for that. You know, I think that if we go back to the, like that green movement, or if we just go back to some of what was happening prior to COVID-19, we can see the difference facts that, you know, there was a push against factory farming.
There's a push against oil. You know, there was a push against all these things that were quote unquote environmental issues. But here's how you've got to ask yourself, why are those environmental issues? You know, why do we care about meat? Why do we care about gas? What do we care about that? Well, the answer is here in the west. A you can get a hamburger anywhere, right? A cost you that it costs you like a dollar or maybe two bucks now with inflation.
But I know that a hamburger would probably cost 20 bucks, but it's subsidized. And there's a bunch of disgusting farming everywhere. That's kind of ruining the land. And no it's a degradation of the environment because of factory farming is a huge problem, especially, and here's the kicker. The rest of the world wants to be like the rich Western countries. They want to be able to go get a hamburger. Some are, they wanna be able to drive the car.
They want all the same things that the people in the rich Western countries have right there. They want to be industrialized. They want to have these things. They want to have all these benefits for their kids and their families and live the Western lifestyle. But if the whole world did that, then the level of degradation on the planet, it would be unlivable. So you can't, you can't just, Can you, you can't just go into another country and say, look, man, you can't live like us. You guys have to be slaves forever.
Even though that's what we've been doing, we've been doing. I think it's the, like a <inaudible> in law that says that there must always be an underclass that will do that shitty jobs. And no one wants like that. That's kind of a foundation of capitalism is that there must be a class of slaves to do the shitty work. No one wants to
Speaker 1 (22m 6s): That is beneath people.
Speaker 0 (22m 8s): I'm not judging. I mean, I'm not saying I believe that what I'm saying that if you take any real economic class or you read any books on economics, then that's pretty much a written rule. And those who tell you, that's not a ruler. So if you want the rest of the world
Speaker 1 (22m 32s): To
Speaker 0 (22m 34s): Live a better life, that means that people that live in the west have to lead the way. That means we got to do a way with factory form. And that means we've got to do a way with the cards. That means we gotta live a more humble lifestyle. Oh. And here in lies, the problem it's easy. It's easier to not attain something and have something taken away from you. Right? There was a S there was a, a book I read called a called.
That was by it's called never split the difference. And it was by the world's leading hostage negotiator. And he spoke a bit about a class at Harvard that he took it and he goes, they did this experiment at Harvard, where they gave a class comes in and they gave half the class, a ceramic mug. And the other the half got no ceramic mug. And they wanted people to team up one person with a mug and one person without a mug. And they said, okay, we want you guys to negotiate.
You know, whoever doesn't have the mug, she tried to negotiate to try to buy the mug and let's see what happens. So they did plenty of negotiations and what they found out when they broke everything down. Some people sold some but more people didn't sell. Even when offered, you know, a, a a hundred bucks, the people were like, nah, I like my mug. And the teachers wanted to know why they go look, we gave you that mug for free. Why, why wouldn't you take the free a hundred bucks? And the people said, oh, well, this is my mug now.
And I don't want to sell it. So they began to find out that once people have something, economics is irrational, no matter how much money you give someone, they want to keep the thing that belongs to them because they believe it's part of them and they don't want to give it up. So let's factor that into the rich Western lifestyle. People have people in the west have two cars, they have a house, they have a yard, they have a pet.
You know, their kid goes to school to take a couple of vacations. They eat meat every day, they drive their fossil fuel car. How do you take that away from them without them fighting? How do you take that stuff away and decrease their level of life style? Well, you have to run a campaign of incredible propaganda. You have to scare them. You have to do a lot of nefarious things in order to break down their psyche.
And the most fucked up part is that the people that are running this campaign, that one, a take away the shit from the middle-class. People are not willing to give up anything in theirs. You see that they have these grand allusions in these grand ideas. In order for us to make the world a better place, we have to take a giant shit on the people right below us. Even that if our countrymen, even if there are a family, we've got a steal their shit. So we can make the world a better place for everyone. What they don't understand is that if they want to make the world a better place, they should lead by fucking example, but they're not willing to give up their matches.
They're not willing to give up their lifestyle. They want you to give up your lifestyle. Think about people like the Royal family or Leonard, Leonard, a DiCaprio. They fly around their goddamn Jet's and tell you your a piece of shit for fucking driving. An old car. Look at Al gore. This dummy has how many that, what is his carbon footprint? Like if you just think for a minute about the people who are running the carbon footprint game, think about the people that are lying to you and using the environment as a shield.
Like I love the planet and everybody, I know that loves the planet, but I hate with a passion. People who try to hide behind environmental regulations to steal from other people. That's a huge problem. That's a huge problem. And most of them say things like, oh, well, we're just doing it to make the world better. No, you're doing it to make yourself better. You lie to yourself about the problem with the planet, and then you steal from everybody else.
I think that's kind of where we are. Okay. Now let me try to tie everything together a little bit. So look at these recent hacks, right? What happened? There was a hacker in a pipeline gas shortage. There was a hack on the meat, plants, meat shortage. Like, isn't it interesting that other so-called Russians or other in government people are hacking the very things that the climate warming alarmists want them to hack.
Isn't that weird? Isn't it weird that COVID-19 is causing small businesses to shut down, but allowing a large multinational corporations to stay afloat like that to me is not a coincidence. In fact, I believe that a coincidence. It's what you get when you don't have all the facts. A coincidence is what you get. When you apply a bad theory, you're going to see more hacks.
And you're going to see more hacks on the industries that the global corporations want. Shut down. You see, they're going to try and modify and utilize BF Skinner type techniques to change your behavior for everyone. It's the hard sell. Oh, and what better way to do it than with an invisible boogeyman, depending on where you are born.
There's always an invisible boogeyman. There's the communist. Oh, no. The big, bad calm. You know, there is the terrorist. Oh no. The comm in his hand, a terrorist. Hey, if you don't, if you don't do this terrorist win, Hey man, if they don't stop eating meat, you're gonna kill a planet. Hey man, you didn't take your shoes off a terrorist when, Hey man, we can have that communism. When you said these are all invisible boogie men that have been perpetrated in order to change the behavior of the public through fear.
And I'm of the opinion I'm of the opinion that you don't, that there will be T like the people getting injected right now with COVID-19 because make no mistake. Like these are the people that have a most effected. And let me just, I don't it's in my opinion, I don't know. But like, let's say, lets say that these particular gene therapies do cause a violent, a violent sort of a response to the next Corona virus.
You see people aren't going to understand that they are, they're not gonna think to themselves. Oh, I got the Corona virus, injection, AKA gene therapy. And now in a new way, when the flu season hits, I'm going to be even worse because my body is going to not attack it in the right way. It's going to hyper attack it and attack my body. While that attacks the virus, the same people that got this gene therapy are going to get hit hard next year and the following year. And it's going to look, it's going to look like it's another wave of viruses.
It's going to look like it's another wave. But in reality, it's because of the gene therapy, you see that they are socially engineering or the next wave of viruses by forcing people to take this experimental gene therapy. It's going to cause those people to be in a worse position next year. Why would they do that, George?
Well, which one among you? Who among you? What do you want among you thinks that the pharmaceutical companies give one fuck about you. All you have to do is like, you know, how about the immortal life of Henrietta lacks? You know, how about the Tuskegee airmen? Our world is filled with mangled as children. You know, science has zero morals.
Science wants to try and explain everything and has no brakes your country, regardless of where you live is filled with human experimentation.
Speaker 1 (31m 51s): It's filled with it. It's everywhere.
Speaker 0 (31m 55s): Think about this. Look at the demographics of the majority of Western countries in America, a miss paraphrasing here. But I think within the next 20 years, over 50%, it might be 60% of the individuals are going to be over 60 years old. We have no cure for Alzheimer's. We have no cure for, for dementia. We don't have any cure for these diseases that are going to plague our world. And how can you have a vibrant economy when the majority of people in your country are geriatric?
How do you take care of them? Not only that, what happens when all of those people that are geriatrics have all the money and they're not spending their money in the economy. Like if you just about it, logically the populations of the west are aging, getting old. They have all the money and it's gonna fucking tank our economy. And it's going to make the world a very uncomfortable place for people that are under the age of 30 or 35, it's going to make, 'em almost destitute.
So what do you do? Well, we need, some people say that we need to aggressively aggressively be looking for signs to help people with dementia. We need to be aggressively doing experiments to find out how to cure Alzheimer's do you guys know part of the gene therapy does for this, for these a M R and D vaccines inside the MRN, a vaccine is instructions to fold proteins, I guess folded proteins are also called prions Brian's or what gets people mad cow disease Alzheimer's disease as a form of plaque in the brain that could be proteins that were folded wrong.
Speaker 1 (33m 50s): So
Speaker 0 (33m 51s): I think plausible to say that this large scale human experimentation on people is an attempt to have an unethical hundreds of millions of people, clinical trials, to try and find cures for new diseases, because we desperately need them. I'm not a judge or a jury, but you're going to do clinical trials on hundreds of millions of people's and ethnicities so that you might find out how to cure a disease.
And then you're going to lie to all the people about them. Like what, why would we do that? Why would we do it? No, for a long time. That blew my mind. Like, if you look at the, if you think about the generational gap, like baby boomers like that, my mom, my dad, they were so fearful of this virus. Oh no, Jesus. He's going to kill everybody. Oh, all gonna die in a 600,000 people in America are dead.
You know, there's bodies laying on the ground. Like, you know, even like that, my neighbor, I love, I love my family and my neighbors, but they, they, the ones that are Boomer's, they just have this crazy idea of like, you have to get the vaccine, man, you have to get it. I was having a conversation with my neighbor whom I love. And he's like, look, man, you got to get the vaccine. I'm like, why? He's like, what do you mean why? He's like, if you get the vaccine, you have a 0% chance of going to the hospital.
I was like talking to myself that I started laughing. You know, I didn't mean to be rude, but I was like what? He goes, yeah. If you get the vaccine, you have a 0% chance of going to the hospital and be in on a ventilator. I just told him, I'm like, are you kidding me? You have a 0% chance of that. I'm like, I don't, I disagree. You're not. And that's not what I read. You know, I've, in my opinion, like the vaccine, AKA, the gene therapy, it doesn't stop transmission.
It doesn't stop you from getting it. All that does is potentially potentially make the symptoms a little bit easier and that's not even proven. So I asked him, I'm like, what? Where did you, what did you get your information? You know what all of them do, all of the boomers watch TV. Like that is where the boomers go to get their information. And I don't care if they watch Fox or if they watch CNN, we've already covered it. That's the same. It's just opposite sides of the same coin.
Both of those dummies, those channels are pumping this vaccine, propaganda, this gene therapy propaganda. Right? And if that, everybody needs to know if you're in marketing, you understand the term target demographics, right? That if you target, if you aren't Facebook, if you market anywhere, you are asked, what is your target demographics? And I can tell you that when it comes to TV, the target demographics for TV are older people, right?
There's a saying that says, if you're over the age of 50, you live in 1970. If you're over the age, if you're under the age of 30, you live in 2010. So the people that are older, the age of 50, they are set in their ways. They get their information from TV. Their brains are not being used. Would you continue to be plastic that the plasticity of their brains is not being utilized?
Does that make sense? They're not making new connections. They're happy with the convictions. They have, they're getting their information. And so the government uses that channel of older people, target demographics to hit them with this vaccine. Why? Well, those are the people that are going to be at risk and the next 20 to 30 years. So if the virus comes and all our, our idea that these gene therapy is going to cause those people at a dilator, well, it's no big deal because they economy is gonna be better off because of it.
It's going to free up money to go into the economy is going to potentially be recorded so that people can find cures for Alzheimer's. You know what? That it's a giant clinical study on people over the age of 50, because that is going to be a population that's going to drain society. So somewhere along the lines, the decision was made, okay, these people are no longer producing. They are just sitting on money. We don't have social security.
They have all the money. These people are dead weight. Let's fucking experiment on them and get them the fuck out of here that also the easiest people to scare, right? They're getting their information from a, a, a resource that is controlled by the government. These are some of the reasons I was just having my mind blown about this. COVID mess you.
I haven't really got too much into the inflation aspect of, and maybe I'll say that part for tomorrow or later in the week, but all these things are running together. I think it's in, in summary. Let me say that. I think what we're seeing is a, a radical effort to step on the working class and lower class of people so that the richest wealthiest people can maintain their lifestyle.
I think we're seeing a radical, a radical change in the economy. We are seeing
Speaker 1 (40m 7s): An attempt to
Speaker 0 (40m 10s): Fundamentally shift supply chains, a technocratic take-over and attempt for engineers to run the world instead of politicians, which I'm not against. But it just seems silly to me that the engineers don't understand that if they get rid of the politicians and they are going to become the politician. But I think we're going to continue to see a large-scale devastation. We are going to see a continued hacks on infrastructure, on supply chains and that the time to prepare is now, anyways, that's all I got for you guys today.
I love you. I hope your day is going awesome. And I appreciate your taking a moment to spend with me. Let me know what you guys think. Put down in your comments, put down a, a, a, either ideas and a get at me. I love you guys a little hot.
Support the show:
https://www.paypal.me/Truelifepodcast?locale.x=en_US
Check out our YouTube:
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLPzfOaFtA1hF8UhnuvOQnTgKcIYPI9Ni9&si=Jgg9ATGwzhzdmjkg
Grow your own:
https://modernmushroomcultivation.com/
This Band Will Blow Your Mind:
Codex Serafini
https://codexserafini.bandcamp.com/album/the-imprecation-of-anima
https://www.paypal.me/Truelifepodcast?locale.x=en_US
Check out our YouTube:
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLPzfOaFtA1hF8UhnuvOQnTgKcIYPI9Ni9&si=Jgg9ATGwzhzdmjkg
Grow your own:
https://modernmushroomcultivation.com/
This Band Will Blow Your Mind:
Codex Serafini
https://codexserafini.bandcamp.com/album/the-imprecation-of-anima
